Understanding facts v. myths of Cannabis legalization
The stigma that surrounds Cannabis legalization, Marijuana, weed, pot and so many other names, facts v. myths, has affected many people especially when it comes to a variety of treatments on ailments, etc.
Before you do or say anything, there are ways for you to know and how to go around this issue without having to go through the unnecessary things. We’ll get straight to the point, how much do we really know about Cannabis legalization and even up until this day there are still misconceptions about this humble herb.
What are the most common Cannabis legalization Myths?
MYTH: Weed is really addictive
*FACT: Fewer than one percent of adults consume weed just once a day.
• FACT: There is nothing in cannabis that induces physical dependency.
• FACT: A number of heavy consumers experience what seems to be dependency and then avoid accessing opioid recovery programs.•Â
That is presumably due to practice, not to abuse.
MYTH: Cannabis legalization use causes memory loss and a general reduction in mental ability
• FACT: Studies have found that cannabis decreases short-term memory, but only when impaired.
There is little empirical proof to show that it is a long-term or lifelong condition while one is drunk.
• FACT: There is no medical opinion on the usage of cannabis and no clinical proof suggesting recreational consumption is detrimental to safety.
• FACT: Marijuana does not induce any significant improvements in the intellectual capacity of an individual.•
After drinking, certain people can feel nausea, agitation, and terror. Such results will change and do not become irreversible.
 This is very unusual for a human to drink so much that they suffer from toxic psychosis. It’s not exclusive to hemp.
MYTH: Marijuana is a felony
- FACT: evidence shows that weed consumers are less prone to commit offenses because of its role in mitigating hostility.•Â
Disclaimer: Thanks to the number of nations that have banned weed, most consumers in the country are legally known as drug offenders.
MYTH: The usage of weed induces apathy and loss of inspiration
FACT: Experiments in which participants obtained a heavy dose of cannabis daily over a span of days or weeks showed that there was little lack in productivity or desire to function.•
 Misuse of some drugs over a lengthy period of time decreases the capacity of an individual to work normally. It’s not exclusive to weed.
MYTH: Marijuana legalization is a "party drug"
- FACT: For certain users, cannabis is a toxic substance, not a recreational product.
Consumers with heavy-strength substances such as cocaine or LSD are often substantially more likely to have been using cannabis in the past, but the association would not indicate a correlation.
 By contrast the number of weed consumers to heavy-drug users, the figures are quite low, indicating that there is no correlation at all.
WE Should ASSESS THE ROLE, EFFECT, AND IMPACT OF CANNABIS?
• Firstly, we inquire!
• Leisure, reaction or violence procurement?
• Does this person have any related difficulties that could increase the margins? “Does this person have access to legal or medicinal cannabis? Is Cannabis legalization necessary?
More Cannabis Legalization myths:
Legalizing marijuana significantly enhances consumption: some nations (Portugal, the Netherlands, Australia, and most of the U.K.) have deregulated their drug policies with nothing to zero impact on cannabis consumption. As a result, a data on U.S. medicinal cannabis policy shows that individual drug use has grown only conservatively.
Provisional statistics in Colorado and Washington, the first two states to legalize medical marijuana, indicate parallel patterns available on the market before and after legalization.
Legalization of marijuana affects underage men. Latest health study results show that easing drug legalization does not substantially improve the usage of underage drug (perhaps in part because this liberalization would not alter the legal status of minor marijuana).Â
In fact, there is no suggestion that drug use induces worse student performance or reduced academic performance.
The association between teenage usage of marijuana and executive performance drops in the analyzes that monitor the specific socioeconomic variables.
Last thoughts
To conclude, the data from the deregulation of drug regulations shows that this failure could have boosted pot use modestly, at least amongst individuals. It also seems to have decreased road deaths, suicide levels and crime rates. While certain substance usage may damage consumers and others, strategies more specifically addressing such risks can mitigate damage more proactively.
Further recent work is required for long-term behavioral health effects and strengthened relationships/communication with clinicians, therapists, and patients. Lastly, consider evidence and theories and live a better life on laws and regulations.
